THE HOST IS STILL FREAKING OUT ON THE PENALTY AND NASIR TRIES TO BRING REASON AND CALM TO THE F1WEEKLY STATE OF THE ART RECORDING STUDIO. ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WORLD ROSS BRAWN COMMENTS ON THIS ISSUE…
“I have a lot of respect for the work of the stewards and for their professionalism and I believe they would be the first to say that they would prefer not to see a race outcome decided via a penalty,” said Brawn, in his regular post-event debrief.
“At the same time, I understand how difficult it must be for fans to understand why the driver on the top step of the podium is not the one who crossed the finish line first. That’s why transparency is important when it comes to explaining the decisions of the stewards, especially in such a complex sport as Formula 1. “It is in football, where despite the arrival of VAR , there is still discussion as to whether a handball should be punished with a penalty or not.
“Therefore, it might be useful to work with the FIA on solutions that would allow the stewards to explain their decisions to the fans and to elaborate on how they reached them.
“Having said that, I would emphatically add is that there is nothing sinister about a decision like this. You might agree with it or not, but none of those who take on the role of steward each weekend has a hidden agenda and fans can be certain of that.”
Despite his views on what the sport should be better in the future, Brawn says his senior role within F1 means it would be wrong of him to offer his view on what should have been done with Vettel.
“I can understand how Vettel feels and I know Ferrari intends to appeal the decision,” he said. “I also know what a difficult job the stewards have, as they have to reach a their decision in a very short time, producing a verdict that can affect the outcome of the race.
“As such, I don’t want to give an opinion on the decision, because in my position it would be wrong to do so.”
Play Podcast: 06-11-19f1weekly792.mp3